On March 19, 2025, Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) appeared on Newsmax to voice his strong opposition to a recent ruling by U.S. District Judge James Jeb Boasberg. The judge’s decision blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to use wartime powers under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport migrants, specifically targeting alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. Gill argued that the ruling undermines national security and called for an immediate appeal.
“This is a dangerous precedent,” Gill told Newsmax. “We’re talking about criminal illegal aliens who pose a real threat to American communities. The judge’s interference with the President’s authority is unacceptable and needs to be challenged quickly.” The congressman emphasized that the administration must act decisively to reverse the decision, warning that delays could embolden further judicial overreach.
The controversy stems from Boasberg’s order to halt deportation flights, including a directive to return planes already in transit. Despite this, the administration completed the removal of over 260 migrants to El Salvador, prompting accusations of defying the court. Gill, a vocal supporter of Trump’s immigration policies, has already taken steps beyond rhetoric—he filed articles of impeachment against Boasberg on March 18, accusing the judge of abusing his power for political gain.
Critics of Gill’s stance, including some Democrats, argue that the ruling protects due process, ensuring migrants aren’t deported without proper hearings. However, Gill dismissed these concerns, framing the issue as a matter of public safety over legal technicalities. “The American people elected President Trump to secure our borders, not to coddle gang members,” he said.
As the debate intensifies, the Trump administration faces mounting pressure to navigate judicial pushback while fulfilling its immigration agenda. Gill’s call for a swift appeal reflects a broader Republican effort to rally behind Trump’s policies, even as legal and political battles loom. With the situation evolving rapidly, the outcome of this clash could shape the future of deportation enforcement in the U.S.
